分类导航

    • 国际经济法学
    • 国际公法学
    • 宪法学
    • 国际法学其他学科
    • 刑法学
    • 更多...

      选择学科

      • 拼音索引
      热门 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 不详
    • 2015
    • 2013
    • 更多...

      选择年代

浏览排行

下载排行

收藏排行

总访问量:293744

Research on Theory, Legislations and Practices about Regulating Non-practicing Entities in China

收藏  纠错 浏览次数(709次)
字体大小:
作者/编者: 孟雁北 作者单位: 中国
学科分类: 经济法学 类型分类: 论文
创作年代: 2016 所属机构: 中国人民大学
出处/来源: 《中国法学前沿》(Frontiers of Law in China)2016年9月刊 文献语种: 英文
发布时间: 2017-01-04 11:20:29 所需积分: 0
外部链接: http://www.law.ruc.edu.cn/flc/ShowArticle.asp?51818.html

摘要Abstract

Non-Practicing Entities (NPE), as a subject, is a neutral concept, but the derogatory sense of translation and understanding on this concept and the chaos of understanding make the legal regulation of NPE encounter more difficulties and challenges. In fact, NPE issues are concerned, discussed and researched in China within quite a long period, however, it would not become an outstanding legal issue nowadays. NPE as a market entity, its existence is legitimate per se, and what the law should focus on is the unfair conduct that NPE might be engaged in rather than the subject of NPE itself. It is not necessary to make specific articles and provisions on the subject of NPE at present in the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the PRC which are revised in China, and a serial of rules and guidelines for Anti-Monopoly Law of the PRC which are formulated in China. It proved that the unfair conducts of NPE should be regulated according to Patent law, Anti-Unfair Competition Law and Anti-Monopoly Law as well as, reconfirmed that the conclusion that the regulation of NPE in China laws focus on conducts rather than subject in a serial of cases such as the anti-monopoly investigation case against INTERDIGITAL Corporation initiated by the National Development and Reform Commission, the case that the Ministry of Commerce imposed restrictive conditions to approve that Microsoft acquired Nokia equipment and service business, and the commercial defamation case that Shenzhen Libang Precision Instrument Co., Ltd vs Shenzhen Mairui Biological Medical Electronic Co., Ltd which was reviewed by the Supreme People’s Court.

  • Research on Theory, Legislations and Practices about Regulating Non-practicing Entities in China - 附件1
    286.84 KB
    马上下载

文献纠错

文章标题 Research on Theory, Legislations and Practices about Regulating Non-practicing Entities in China
错误内容
正确说法
  提交
文献星级
  • 5分 共有0人评价过此文献,平均分为0

同作者

收藏信息