分类导航

    • 国际公法学
    • 国际经济法学
    • 宪法学
    • 国际法学其他学科
    • 刑法学
    • 更多...

      选择学科

      • 拼音索引
      热门 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2013
    • 不详
    • 更多...

      选择年代

浏览排行

下载排行

收藏排行

总访问量:219941

Rhetoric of the Lawyer and Philosophical Conversation

收藏  纠错 浏览次数(340次)
字体大小:
作者/编者: Guy Haarscher 作者单位: 布鲁塞尔自由大学
学科分类: 法哲学 类型分类: 论文
创作年代: 2016 所属机构: 布鲁塞尔自由大学
出处/来源: 《中国法学前沿》(Frontiers of Law in China)2016年9月刊 文献语种: 英文
发布时间: 2017-02-06 15:18:17 所需积分: 0
外部链接: http://www.law.ruc.edu.cn/uploadfile/201611/201611116382473499.pdf

摘要Abstract

The article focuses on the difference between strategic rhetoric and philosophical conversation. It first tries to distinguish between sophistical manipulation and valid strategic argumentation. In order to do that, the author tries to give a new meaning to the old Aristotelian tripartition between logos, ethos, and pathos. Then, he uses Chaim Perelman’s theory of argumentation to show that the standard of rationality in practical reasoning is a specific one. After having clarified the very concept of strategic argumentation, the author distinguishes it from the notion of philosophical conversation. He tries to show that if the latter is completely replaced by the former, the danger exists that victimization and morals “a la carte” will generate a defeat of critical thought.

附件1 马上下载

文献纠错

文章标题 Rhetoric of the Lawyer and Philosophical Conversation
错误内容
正确说法
  提交
文献星级
  • 共有0人评价过此文献,平均分为0

同作者

同机构

收藏信息