知而不为:优先保护区的选择与研究-实施差距(英文)
——Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap
摘要
保护评估是一门迅速发展的学科,其既定目标是设计保护区网络,通过将优先区域与退化或破坏它们的活动分开,代表并确保自然(即物种、栖息地和环境过程)的持久性。尽管如此,尽管新兴的科学文献不断完善这些分配保护资源的技术,但人们普遍认为,保护评估很少转化为实际保护自然的行动。我们回顾了同行评审期刊上的保护评估文献,并对这些研究的作者进行了问卷调查。同行评审的科学文献中公布的三分之二的保护评估没有提供保护行动,主要是因为大多数研究人员从未计划实施。Conservation assessment is a rapidly evolving discipline whose stated goal is the design of networks of protected areas that represent and ensure the persistence of nature (i.e., species, habitats, and environmental processes) by separating priority areas from the activities that degrade or destroy them. Nevertheless, despite a burgeoning scientific literature that ever refines these techniques for allocating conservation resources, it is widely believed that conservation assessments are rarely translated into actions that actually conserve nature.We reviewed the conservation assessment literature in peer-reviewed journals and conducted survey questionnaires of the authors of these studies. Two-thirds of conservation assessments published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature do not deliver conservation action, primarily because most researchers never plan for implementation.
正文
备注
文献为PDF格式,语种为英文,共8页。